System Hub
Start 14-day free trial
Local authority pages

Digital SFBB and food safety software for UK restaurants, by city

Officers are local. The pack is national. These pages name the council (or shared service), the FSA register count, and how kitchens in that city actually run. If two pages would read the same after you swapped the city name, we do not publish the second one.

Last reviewed: . Reviewed by Nitin Patel. Drafts are prepared with AI assistance and checked by him before publication. Register counts from FSA open data.

Why have a separate page for each city?

A restaurant in Glasgow is not on Safer Food, Better Business. A restaurant in Cardiff is inspected by Shared Regulatory Services, not a city food office, and must display its rating. A restaurant in London is inspected by the borough, not by “London Council”. Those facts change the page. A headline that only inserts the city name does not.

System Hub Food Safety is timestamped checks during the shift, from £5/week after a 14-day trial. It is not EHO approved, FSA endorsed, or Primary Authority. Digital records are acceptable when they are complete, dated, and accessible.

Cities we have unique copy for

London

SFBB · your London borough

5,732 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Manchester

SFBB · Manchester City Council

6,426 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Birmingham

SFBB · Birmingham City Council

10,221 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Leeds

SFBB · Leeds City Council

7,419 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Liverpool

SFBB · Liverpool City Council

4,597 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Bristol

SFBB · Bristol City Council

4,486 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Cardiff

SFBB · Shared Regulatory Services

3,492 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Glasgow

CookSafe · Glasgow City Council

6,632 food businesses on the FSA register (15 September 2026)

Edinburgh

CookSafe · City of Edinburgh Council

5,132 food businesses on the FSA register (13 September 2026)

Belfast

Safe Catering · Belfast City Council

3,177 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)

Milton Keynes

SFBB · Milton Keynes City Council

2,521 food businesses on the FSA register (16 September 2026)
City Usual pack Food authority FSA register
London Safer Food, Better Business your London borough 5,732
Manchester Safer Food, Better Business Manchester City Council 6,426
Birmingham Safer Food, Better Business Birmingham City Council 10,221
Leeds Safer Food, Better Business Leeds City Council 7,419
Liverpool Safer Food, Better Business Liverpool City Council 4,597
Bristol Safer Food, Better Business Bristol City Council 4,486
Cardiff Safer Food, Better Business Shared Regulatory Services 3,492
Glasgow CookSafe Glasgow City Council 6,632
Edinburgh CookSafe City of Edinburgh Council 5,132
Belfast Safe Catering Belfast City Council 3,177
Milton Keynes Safer Food, Better Business Milton Keynes City Council 2,521

Register counts are all food businesses on the FSA list, not restaurants only. Dates are on each city page.

What we will not generate

We will not add a town because a keyword tool listed it. A new city needs a real local-authority food page, a sourced register count, and kitchen copy that would break if you pasted in another place name. Scotland stays on CookSafe. Northern Ireland stays on Safe Catering. We do not fake a LocalBusiness address in every city — Oriel Technology Ltd is in Milton Keynes.

National guides

Start 14-day free trial Food Safety product page

Which pack does each nation's officer expect?

A city page that only swaps the place name is a page we refuse to publish. The officer is employed by a council, not by “the UK”. England and Wales kitchens are usually on Safer Food, Better Business. Scotland is CookSafe. Northern Ireland is Safe Catering.

The register count on each page is dated and comes from FSA open data, and it counts every food business on that register, not restaurants alone. London is not one authority: a site in Camden and a site in Westminster are two inspections and two diaries.

We do not invent a System Hub office in each city. Oriel Technology Ltd is in Milton Keynes. We do not inspect, and we do not claim a council’s endorsement.

If a city does not yet have a page, it is because we do not yet have the authority’s own food page, a sourced count, and a kitchen pattern that would be wrong if you pasted another city’s name in. That is the test. Use the national guides for the diary itself: opening checks, temperatures, the 4-weekly review, and what an EHO asks to see.

If you run sites in two cities, you still keep a diary per site. A manager in Leeds cannot sign Manchester’s opening checks because they were not in that kitchen. The city page tells you which council and which pack. It does not merge the records. The price is still £5 a week for each kitchen, VAT included, not £5 for the group.

Daily checks for one kitchen. A second city is a second diary.
The city page names the council. It does not merge the records.